Track days at Mission Raceway Park |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
AllanJ
Senior Member Joined: 28 July 2010 Status: Offline Points: 254 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Track days at Mission Raceway Park Posted: 02 August 2011 at 6:32pm |
If some of you were curious what the racetrack is like in Mission, here is a video I took last week when I was there for a track day. I think Brian has brought up track days in the past, so consider this a reminder of what fun you can have out there and not worry about the police. lol! The best way to get on the track is to come to a few autox events first to get a feel for how your car behaves when really pushed and to learn some real car handling skills. Then sign up with a track day group that has instructors and you will have a ton of fun out there. This video is 3 laps of Mission Raceway and I'm taking it fairly easy in the turns. I'm just getting a feel for the new suspension and enjoying the ride. I put a speedometer on the video but it's in mph, not km/h. Silly US-based software developers.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WU-p2e3YOwI
|
|
karnak
Senior Member Joined: 28 August 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 349 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 02 August 2011 at 7:11pm |
Very nice. do you have a link where you open it up a little more?
|
|
AllanJ
Senior Member Joined: 28 July 2010 Status: Offline Points: 254 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 02 August 2011 at 7:16pm |
Check back near the end of August.
|
|
AllanJ
Senior Member Joined: 28 July 2010 Status: Offline Points: 254 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 08 September 2011 at 9:46pm |
Here ya go. New personal best lap My old best lap was 1:16.5 and today I did a 1:15.2. Definitely getting into race car territory now. I'm a happy camper. |
|
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 08 September 2011 at 9:56pm |
Man, I love that display with the video! It's great being able to see exactly where you are on the track with that moving red dot. Is that long straightaway actually the 1/4 mile dragstrip?
|
|
Bassman
Senior Post God Sir Brian Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2501 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 08 September 2011 at 10:00pm |
Might do the Morrisport on Thanksgiving with the Mazda3...that system rocks Allan...
|
|
Brian (Bassman)
86 GT Fastback 3.2L 2013 Mazda3 Sport GS SkyActive [IMG]http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u243/Bassman68/BassmanSignature.png"> |
|
Colby
Admin Group Joined: 30 March 2009 Location: Abbotsford/Sask Status: Offline Points: 665 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 08 September 2011 at 10:05pm |
Doesn't really look like it is. |
|
88 Formula 5 speed
|
|
AllanJ
Senior Member Joined: 28 July 2010 Status: Offline Points: 254 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 08 September 2011 at 10:12pm |
It's nice software and the company seems quite responsive to enhancing it as they can when users give their feedback. The straightaway we use (for the road course) is the end of the 1/4 mile dragstrip. It's where the cars slow down and then they use part of the road course (turn 3 through turn 7) to slowly cruise back to the start of the drag strip. |
|
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 19 September 2011 at 7:05pm |
I've quoted this from another thread, but it seems odd that nothing has yet been announced about the upcoming AutoX 101 which is now less than two weeks away. It was briefly mentioned Here, but that was 14 days ago. Anyone know anything?
|
|
Bassman
Senior Post God Sir Brian Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2501 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 19 September 2011 at 8:39pm |
I posted asking Ben when he'll get more details up...
|
|
Brian (Bassman)
86 GT Fastback 3.2L 2013 Mazda3 Sport GS SkyActive [IMG]http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u243/Bassman68/BassmanSignature.png"> |
|
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 19 September 2011 at 8:59pm |
Thanks Brian. |
|
Bassman
Senior Post God Sir Brian Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2501 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 19 September 2011 at 9:58pm |
Re: AutoX 101?by Behnam » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:58 pm I am waiting for the UBC club days to be over before I post the event. We want to give the new students members as well as existing members a fair chance of signing up for the event. Club days is on Wednesday this week so expect the event late on Wed or early Thursday. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
Brian (Bassman)
86 GT Fastback 3.2L 2013 Mazda3 Sport GS SkyActive [IMG]http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u243/Bassman68/BassmanSignature.png"> |
|
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 20 September 2011 at 8:37am |
Probably for the same reason you measure 0-60MPH, not 0-98.2KM/H. Or top speed in MPH. Or use horsepower and ibs-fit, instead of kilowatts and newton-metres. Imperial > Metric. |
|
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
|
Colby
Admin Group Joined: 30 March 2009 Location: Abbotsford/Sask Status: Offline Points: 665 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 20 September 2011 at 10:47am |
You might use ibs-fit but I'm pretty sure the rest of the world uses ft*lbs. |
|
88 Formula 5 speed
|
|
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 20 September 2011 at 2:44pm |
Bah, I hit the 'i' by accident. But foot-pounds is what's used to calculate muzzle velocity, and is comparable to measurements using joules. People mistakenly use it for torque measurements. Thus, ft-ibs is incorrectly used as well. Torque is measured in pounds-foot, hence, ibs-ft. If it's easier to think of, consider that one is comparing a static force to the amount of distance it covers (Foot-pounds). The other is comparing a static distance to how much force it makes (Pounds-foot). |
|
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
|
Colby
Admin Group Joined: 30 March 2009 Location: Abbotsford/Sask Status: Offline Points: 665 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 20 September 2011 at 3:10pm |
I was bugging you about the "fit" but I had no idea ft-lbs and lbs-ft were two different things. Imperial units make no sense! I guess now that I think about it, you actually have the same situation in metric as well. With Nm being either work/energy or torque, but you always take energy/work to be Joules instead of Nm.
|
|
88 Formula 5 speed
|
|
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 22 September 2011 at 3:52pm |
Precisely. And don't you trash talk Imperial. It kicks Metric's ass any day.
|
|
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
|
karnak
Senior Member Joined: 28 August 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 349 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 22 September 2011 at 10:16pm |
Ya! At least 19/25ths of the time.
|
|
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 September 2011 at 3:21pm |
So, Colby, how many Nm of torque does the newer Porsche engine make? What's that, no one measures in metric, because it's an asanine system? Well, guess you better use ibs-ft then. And HP. And 0-60. And MPH. Imperial > Rough estimates using body parts > Metric |
|
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
|
Colby
Admin Group Joined: 30 March 2009 Location: Abbotsford/Sask Status: Offline Points: 665 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 September 2011 at 4:09pm |
I'm willing to bet that if they calculated it, it was done by first converting from imperial to metric, working it out, then back to imperial.
Sure, more people measure with imperial, I won't try to argue that. But if you actually have to work something out then doing it with imperial can often be so much more of a headache that it's often easier to convert to metric and convert back when you're done. |
|
88 Formula 5 speed
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |