![]() |
Engine Breather - Bypass - oil leaks |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 28 September 2010 at 4:52pm |
||
I have a question about when you disconnect the Engine
Breather from the valve cover to the Intake (before TB). Since there is a vacuum to the engine block (during throttle open) would it be possible that a loss of this vacuum to your engine could result in slight oil loss through once before unrecognized leaky seals...? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Just to clarify... Your PCV valve is still connected, isn't it? That's where the vacuum is applied.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yes it is. Ahhhhh so the breather tube is minimal by comparison then...??
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
In theory, the tube you're referring to is there to supply filtered air to the crankcase that the PCV valve is sucking through into the intake manifold. However, as you've probably noticed from the residue left behind, oily crankcase vapors often go the other way into the opening of the throttle body and muck it up. One solution is to use an oil catch-can. Another is to use a separate small air filter instead of having the tube you're referring to connected to its factory location.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I am not convinced that this should be disconnected.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I certainly wasn't trying to convince you. Mine's connected.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Romeo ![]() Senior Post God ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
As is mine. I'd leave her be, Kevin.
|
|||
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Capt Fiero ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Founding Member Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4039 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
This mod that Kevin has, has been done to Mine, Brian's, Tims and several other Fiero's including Nigel's before he left. It keeps the engine from inhaling HOT Oily air under WOT situations. It saves the IAC from getting mucked up and improves both throttle response and gas mileage. Kevin's issue comes from the fact that he has fairly extensive amounts of blow-by from bad compression rings in his engine. Its a catch 22, the blow-by is so bad that it is making the engine run poorly, so it should be removed to make the engine run better, but on the flip side, the smoke is now exiting the K&N Filter connected to the valve cover as well as allowing a small bit of oil from the crank case to build up in the small valve cover breather filter. |
|||
Capt Fiero
88 Fiero GT 5spd V6 Eight Fifty Seven GT V8 5spd. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Short of rebuiding the engine, sounds like an oil catch-can installed in-line with Kevin's breather hose is the route to go then. I made a catch-can years ago and used it on a 1970 Nova that was puking copious amounts of oil into the air filter housing. Worked great.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Actually my engine doesn't run that bad as far as I am concerned and for some reason I am getting better fuel economy with the tube thing left connected to my intake - as for my K&N filter I only had this on for about a week and is still clean. Also I really did not like the small amount of smoke visible in my rear view mirror - not too mention the stink of it coming into the car at slower speeds. ![]() Thanks for the feedback guys - more is always better! ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I tend to like leaving factory designed stuff alone especially with engines - you would hope that engineers are paid the big bucks to do things right - and yes at the same time I agree some stuff can always be improved (but does one improvement justify the potential detriment of something else...) ![]() Cheers! Oh and we sort of got off topic here. I was more concerned about the Crankcase vacuum state as opposed to free air state and how this may affect oil seal leaks. Anymore theories on this matter would be appreciated ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Dawg ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 August 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 988 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I think it's reasonable to assume that IF you have bad rings, you are going to get more "blow by" into the crank case if you're applying vacuum via the intake system. Not something you want.
In a good engine I think the slight vacuum help evacuated the pressure in an environmentally safe way by burning it before it enters the atmosphere. In a not so good engine I think you need to adapt to the situation to keep it running as long as possible. I would remove and vent to the atmosphere through some sort of passive filtration if it were me. Hook it back up once you get a good engine in there. The Dawg |
|||
You dream it up....I'll make it
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Dr.Fiero ![]() Senior Post God ![]() Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1726 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Another thing you can do, is stick the K&N back in there, then wrap a wrist sweat band around it.If you still get too much smoke after that - you've simply got SUCH a worn out engine, it's time for new rings (etc) anyhow.
As for the question of engineers getting paid the big bucks to do it right... well... they DID. Then the engine kept running for ANOTHER 20 years past it's normal usage and it wore out. Simple. Regarding the crankcase being under vacuum. That's where it normally is (well, is supposed to be) when it's running right. As the thing wears out, the blowby exceeds the PCV's capacity to pull one. I mean, we're not talking 15" of mercury or anything here (while you might see 20" in a high end race only engine). It might be 1 or 2". Just enough to keep the crud in the air being pulled out. Easy test - pull the breather out. Stick your thumb over it, and rev the engine to about 1.5-2K and hold it. Thumb get slightly pulled in after about 30 seconds? You're probably OK. No pull? Worn out. |
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Thanks guys. I am currently trying a middle ground. Sort of what Patrick mentioned but without the catch can. I installed a "t" section on the breather tube and connected my K&N filter so now the smoke is sucked up but the engine is paritally vented as well. Not sure if this completely minimizes suck on the bad rings but I am sure it helps and also keeps the smoke exit to a minimum. Any other thoughts? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Honestly, there is not enough "suck" on that breather tube to affect crankcase vacuum at all. It's the other tube, the one that's connected to the PCV valve and the intake manifold that supplies all the "suck".
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Exactly my point. With the breather open to free air the pcv will never provide any vacuum to the crankcase...or am I wrong here? FYI - My aircare (is there a better place to post this) HC Driving 73ppm CO Driving 0.6% NOx Driving 906ppm HC Idle 311ppm CO Idle 0.84% Result Pass ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It sounds to me like you've got it wrong. The intake manifold is sucking air from the crankcase (through the PCV valve) whether you've got the other breather tube connected in front of your throttle body or not. The following is taken from Here. SYSTEM OPERATION: Blow-by gases mix with the air/fuel mixture and are burned during combustion. When the engine is running, fresh air is drawn into the crankcase through a tube or hose connected to the air cleaner housing. This system is still the same as it was when it was first used in 1961. ![]()
During certain engine conditions more blow-by gases are created than the ventilator valve can handle. The excess is returned through the air intake tube to the air cleaner and carburetor where it is burned in the engine. A quick check of the system can he made by pulling the end of the PCV valve out of the valve cover and placing a finger over the end of the valve to block the air flow, while the engine is idling.
To isolate the problem, remove the PCV valve from the hose and note vacuum felt and any change in idle speed.
As for the other end, the air intake side, there is little that can go wrong. As long as the hose or breather filter is not clogged, air has to enter the system. ------------------------------------- Kevin, I've indicated in red the part that especially applies to your situation.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Patrick, I get that part. But internally (crankcase) are
they not both opening into the same big space (crankcase)...? I think our perspectives are slightly different here. ![]() (in everyday usage, vacuum is a volume of space that is essentially empty of matter, such that its gaseous pressure is much less than atmospheric pressure) Yes I get this part. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Patrick ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I've added to my earlier post to try and make my point(s) clearer to you.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kharmata ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Excellent - thank you! Now I wonder if maybe my PCV is not
working at all??? Since gases escape from my breather hole instead of fresh air being drawn in. Or my rings are so bad that the blow by exceeds what the pcv can extract...? ah now i see it quote: During certain engine conditions more blow-by gases are created than the ventilator valve can handle. The excess is returned through the air intake tube to the air cleaner and carburetor where it is burned in the engine. I maybe getting it finally! |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |