Still keeping the Fiero |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
Fiero308
Senior Member Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 107 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Still keeping the Fiero Posted: 29 December 2010 at 12:22pm |
|
Well I finally had it with the Real Ferrari. I'm going
to sell the damn thing (offers anyone?). I am of course keeping the 308 replica Dr. Fiero is working on. Anyway to satisfy "she who must not be named" I bought a 2006 Chrysler 300c SRT8. 4 door reliable domestic car for the wife. 425hp rwd for me. There is a huge amount of aftermarket stuff for this car which I plan to make use off. Anyway getting to the point of this thread. I want to Supercharge or Turbocharge the car. There are many bolt on kits for this car either way. The question is.....Which is better turbo or supercharging wrt geting through Aircare? It would seem to me that turbo charging might be the way to go since I could easily change the levels of boost (no pulleys to change)so that when I show up at Aircare I could use a Diablosport Predator to return the car to a stock tune, lower the boost to zero and pass the test Thoughts anyone? |
||
Car-2-Lo
Senior Post God Joined: 14 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1266 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 1:06pm | |
Why even ask, sounds like you have already made up your mind going Turbo A Supercharger looks cooler |
||
Fiero308
Senior Member Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 107 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 1:30pm | |
No I haven't made up my mind at all. Its just with the
very small amount of automotive knowledge I possess that turbo seems the way to go. Superchargers are usually easier to install and as you say look cooler but I don't know enough to make an informed decision, hence the post. By the way the pictures I uploaded didn't upload and they were funny too. Anyone know what I did wrong? |
||
beken
Admin Group Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1462 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 1:31pm | |
Tough call.
Based on experience with MINIs, most of the motorheads like the supercharged car better than the turbocharged ones. The supercharged cars have turned out to be easier to work on, but that may be because BMW tightened their grip on the turbo cars with their computer controls. The turbo cars make better horsepower out of the box. The supercharged are easier to "upgrade" to make better horsepower than the turbocharged cars. I suspect the main reason MINIs became turbocharged was because of better fuel efficiency and probably better emissions. General consensus amongst MINI people is the supercharged cars have been more fun to drive and easier to "tune". But the supercharged cars, other than the timing change issue, have had better engine reliability. Not sure how that would relate the a 300C. I do, however like the fact that a supercharged car doesn't generally need a warm-up and cool down period when starting up or finishing a long drive. Turbo cars do to make sure the oils are properly circulated in the booster unit itself. |
||
Beken (aka Ken) - bekentech@westcoastfieros.com Original and still the owner of an 85SE 2M6 4spd |
||
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 1:46pm | |
Okay, I'm officially confused by all the references to "supercharged".
|
||
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 1:48pm | |
No idea. Hugh, if you wish you can email them to me and I'll post them for you.
Okay, I'll start the bidding at 50 bucks, and that's only because it would look nice parked beside the house.
|
||
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 2:06pm | |
Either form of boost wont have any effect what-so-ever in aircare, so long as you're staying out of boost. Unless the fool dynoing the car has it pinned, that wont be an issue for either supercharging or turbocharging. For personality and daily-driving, I would suggest the supercharger. For raw power figures I would assume the turbo might pump a higher dyno chart. But as Johnny Boy said, a supercharger is waaaay more delightful. |
||
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
||
Fiero308
Senior Member Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 107 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 2:10pm | |
That is what I wanted to know. Which system is easier to
adjust boost levels once its installed? Is it an automatic fail to add a supercharger/turbocharger to a car? Hugh |
||
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 4:09pm | |
Here you go Hugh. If you (or a forum moderator) can copy and paste these images into your first post, I'll delete the images here.
|
||
Car-2-Lo
Senior Post God Joined: 14 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1266 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 4:15pm | |
Hugh,Hugh, you have Turbo SUPERCAR toy now, why are you trying to hot rod your cheap (daily driver) domestic car
As a daily driver you should have something classy BENZ or BEAMER |
||
Fiero308
Senior Member Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 107 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 4:44pm | |
Thanks Patrick I still can't do it lets see if one of the
moderators can do it. WRT Car-2-Lo's comment I figure he should know by now that I have no class (ask my wife!!) and a benz or Bimmer would be inappropriate |
||
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 7:04pm | |
Both systems will have a bypass or wastegate which can be programmed for different boost levels, and from the ICBC/Aircare website: "No modification may be performed which will negatively impact emissions from a vehicle. For example, one cannot take a fuel injected inline-four and drop in a carberated V8." Now, in theory this means both supercharging and turbocharging are off-limits. In practice? You'll be fine, boost shouldn't even come in to play at Aircare. |
||
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
||
marcelvdgn
Senior Member Joined: 13 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 284 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 11:01pm | |
60 bucks
|
||
Marcel 86SE V6 Auto
85SE V6 Auto 85 2m4 soon to be sleeper 3.8sc 5 speed |
||
Fiero308
Senior Member Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 107 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 29 December 2010 at 11:13pm | |
All right Romeo I feel a lot better. Now I need to sell
the Ferrari to pay for all this |
||
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 30 December 2010 at 12:42am | |
Why not just become a professional lottery winner instead? That's my life-plan.
|
||
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
||
Dawg
Senior Member Joined: 15 August 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 988 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 30 December 2010 at 2:32am | |
I agree. They never rev the car high enough to get any serious boost. Besides, if the engine is set up right, you shouldn't be polluting much more anyway I don't think.
My cousin back East had a Ferrari like yours and had nothing but trouble with it. He bought it because it had been in storage for over 10 years and he thought it would be mint. Well it did look nice after some detailing alright. But because it hadn't been running for so long and the dumb sh*t basically jumped into it and drove off without any servicing it died on the freeway on his way home. It cost him $25,000 to get it road worthy again. Well that was just the beginning. Around every corner he was spending more and more. Finally he snapped the timing belt doing 210 on the Interstate in Delaware. Had to trailer it home. I could go on......:) He put a used motor in it and said goodbye. The Dawg
|
||
You dream it up....I'll make it
|
||
beken
Admin Group Joined: 12 February 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1462 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 30 December 2010 at 3:32pm | |
Yah...I'm old and the brain finger sync doesn't work like it used to. Okay, I've gone and fixed it. The supercharged cars are easier to upgrade (in horsepower) than the turbo ones. In the case of MINIs, that's because the wastegate (turbocharged) is not adjustable. Lots of things to consider. If you have an adjustable wastegate for the turbocharger, you need to make sure your ECU can handle the change in boost. The same with supercharged cars. Except you manipulate boost by changing the pulley. There is no wastegate in supercharged cars. If you decide you want to boost your engine, I would highly recommend you use an intercooler to bring down the temperature of your intake air. boosting your engine intake for a modern engine should not increase your emmisions. The engine ECU should take care of that. |
||
Beken (aka Ken) - bekentech@westcoastfieros.com Original and still the owner of an 85SE 2M6 4spd |
||
Romeo
Senior Post God Joined: 16 November 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3033 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 30 December 2010 at 5:38pm | |
Ken, if I'm not mistaken there is a wastegate in the Supercharged Minis, is there not? I believe it pumps any pressure above the throttle blade and below the supercharger out to atmosphere, so that when you're engine braking, you arn't pumping alot of air against a shut throttle blade... You are completely right about the tuning, Ken. In fact, as silly as it sounds, vehicles' ECUs prefer supercharging because the engine isn't trying to adapt to a constantly changing MAP signal (A turbo goes from about 14.7 psi, then slides up to peak boost, then down to about 4 psi while shifting... A supercharger goes from peak boost, to about 4 psi and back. No slow changes). And I still stand by the belief that this sounds better than this. |
||
Never shift into reverse without a back-up plan.
|
||
Patrick
Newbie Joined: 19 April 2008 Location: Vancouver Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 30 December 2010 at 6:30pm | |
Fiero308
Senior Member Joined: 01 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 107 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 30 December 2010 at 11:54pm | |
This video gives a much better comparison of the sounds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Krt1PNIiZXQ I definitely am not a fan of loud cars sorry Patrick that truck is too rumbly. |
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |